January 8, 2016

Welcome to Europe




Continue reading


January 7, 2016

Why Support The Saudis



January 7, 2016

Franklin Truth



January 7, 2016

Who Protects Your Family



January 7, 2016

Margaret Sanger and Hillary Clinton



January 7, 2016

900 Bases in 153 Companies

Entanglements costing trillions of dollars effecting millions of lives.




January 7, 2016

Tanks, Artillery, Snipers and Heavy Fire



January 7, 2016

Before You Accuse Me Take a Look At Yourself



January 7, 2016

Disgusting Pig of a Woman





December 21, 2015

Chemicals and False Flags

The Washington Times has an ongoing FOIA request for information about Syria’s supposed extensive chemical weapons arsenal. The requests have been denied because of the Defense Department’s Defense Threat Reduction Agency. That agencies mission was to remove and destroy Syria’s supposed stocks of lethal gas components. Part of the information the Times were interested in was the history of Syria’s involvement with chemical weapons industry.


The Time’s main interest is what the role of ANY third parties, such a rogue scientists or other countries, in producing and/or acquiring chemical weapons components and weaponzing them in bombs and artillery shells.


They first asked the Pentagon to provide detailed information. They then referred any questions to the U.N. supported Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. When asked, a spokesman said that as a matter of practice it does not provide these details.


The Times is very interested in an inventory of the chemicals and their origins. They were denied because they were told the request was too broad. So specifically they asked for information on the components handled and their origin, whether it be Syria or third party. This time they acknowledged it had some applicable information, but cited a U. S. law that allows it to withhold “certain sensitive information of foreign governments and international organizations”


false-flagSo we have information that at one time was the pretense of the United States intervening in a sovereign country and waging was against a duly elected ruler of a country.

We’ve since determined that there is no actually proof that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons. In fact evidence points that it was actually was the origin of the weapons. Is there a reason Obama choose to draw a red line and not act? Continue reading